‘The Ides of March’ a slick-but-gutless political fable

- Advertisement -
The Ides of March
Written by George Clooney, Grant Heslov, and Beau Willimon
Directed by George Clooney
USA, 2011

Depite the rising tides of discontent among the politically disenfranchised in North America – and the growing number who can count themselves among those ranks – politically relevant entertainment is not exactly flourishing at the moment. At best, some working-man’s revenge comedies strain for timeliness through toothless class warfare (Horrible Bosses, the forthcoming Tower Heist) – beyond that, the realm of fictional narrative features has stayed mostly mum in a period of considerable turmoil and economic doomsaying. George Clooney’s fourth feature as a director, The Ides of March, doubtless means well and should feel like a breath of fresh air given the frustratingly apolitical pop-culture climate, but it’s such a weak-kneed affair that the would-be import barely registers.

Derived from Beau Willimon’s off-Broadway play Farragut North, Ides stars Ryan Gosling (whose mannerisms here are startlingly Sean Penn-like) as Stephen Myers, assistant campaign head for the fledgling presidential campaign of a pie-sky Democrat, Gov. Mike Morris (Clooney). The Ohio contest looms large, with Morris’s rival too close behind in the polling for comfort, not to mention worries that Republicans will punch the other ticket in the hopes of pushing forward a more beatable Dem candidate. Myers’s direct superior, Paul (Philip Seymour Hoffman), is relying heavily on the support (and heavy delegate load) of a dodgy-but-influential senator (Jeffrey Wright), whose demand is simple, but a deal-breaker for Morris: an endorsement in exchange for the position of Secretary of State if elected. Despite Morris’s insistence on running as clean a capaign as possible, the ambitious Myers tempts fate by agreeing to meet with Morris’s opponent’s Machiavellian campaign strategist (Paul Giamatti), which kickstarts a deceptively simple chain of events that totally re-orients the race.

As far as exposés of corrupt campaign machinations go, Ides is a little on the gutless side, despite Willimon’s real-life behind-the-scenes experience (having worked on Howard Dean’s doomed campaign for the Democratic nomination back in 2004). Morris himself feels a bit like an amalgam of Dean, John Edwards, and Obama (whose Fairey campaign posters are mimicked here) – Dems with a tendency towards proudly left-leaning rhetoric who, for one reason or another, didn’t pan out to be the saviours they might have initially appeared. What’s disappointing about Ides is that for all of its seen-it-all rhetoric (including reporter Marissa Tomei’s early-film line about how all pols ultimately turn out to be merely human), it’s entirely content to go over well-trod ethical ground. Myers undergoes a fairly pat transition from doe-eyed political optimist to hardened opportunist in a manner that doesn’t offer any particularly cutting insights for anyone even remotely familiar with recent US electoral history, or indeed who’s spent any time scrutinizing electoral politics almost anywhere.

As with Good Night and Good Luck, Clooney’s relative modesty is his greatest strength; at a tidy 100 minutes, Ides is nothing if not efficient, even excluding certain key plot moments in order to dial down any potential histrionics on the part of its across-the-board solid cast (or, in one notable case, keeping a climactic exchange tastefully cloaked within a campaign vehicle). That same modesty, however, works to keep Ides firmly in the realm of the competent and far from the transcendent; Clooney has often expressed great admiration for Sidney Lumet’s Network, a film that, for whatever its flaws, possesses potent and aggressively wrought notions about power, corporatism, and exploitation that still resonate. By contrast, for all of its tasteful elisions and carefully measured performances, it’s unlikely Ides and its familiar ethical quandries will trouble anyone past Christmas, let alone by the time the titular day of reckoning next comes around.

Simon Howell

5 Comments
  1. James Galloghly says

    I think you’re giving the movie too much if a hard time. There’s only do much narrative you can fit into 1 hour and 40 minutes. I 100% agree with the comments about pop culture movies and how pointless and almost detrimental they can be to modern society when we all should be taking a critical view towards everything, especially in the media. But Clooney tells a story virtually everyone can relate to and can help individuals to understand how American politics work and how they have worked for years. People fall for rhetoric too easily and candidates always promise change but generally continue with the status quo. I really enjoyed the movie.

  2. tmack says

    @BillMesce–you are talking about movies for adults vs superhero/action films or animated ones like Lion King? Just looking at the box office, Real Steel, a film about fighting robots (?) made $27 million dollars. I suspect if Ides had a few chase scenes and an assassination, the film would have made more money, though it’s done well at $10 million for an opening, thanks to Clooney & Gosling fans no doubt.

    However, Clooney, one of the writers of the script, could have put a bit more thought into the story.

  3. tmack says

    Ides could have taken place almost anytime during the 20th century, it’s story is that ordinary in the world of political campaigns and ambitions. The only character who changes substantially in the film is Myers, but his changed viewpoint is without nuance , surprise, or suspense. The writers relied on current partisan politics to cast the characters & update the issues from the days of The Candidate or All The King’s Men (the one with Broderick Crawford). All in all, I prefer those to Ides. Jeffrey Wright was really wasted in the role of the senator. I believe Primary did a better job of showing the effect cutthroat politics can have on the idealistic campaign workers.

    1. Simon Howell says

      “Without nuance, surprise, or suspense” kind of nails it for me. It’s extremely proficient in a lot of ways, but it’s already pretty much vacated my mind completely.

  4. Bill Mesce says

    I haven’t seen IDES, and while I understand what you’re saying, let’s also concede that full-bodied gutsiness in a dramatic film of substance is, these days, a near-guarantee of box office failure, even for a picture as modestly budgeted as IDES (Clooney put the budget at Hollywood pocket change — $12 million — in a recent interview with Charlie Rose). When you think of movies that tried to recapture that same NETWORK era blend of entertainment and substance — movies like NARC, THERE WILL BE BLOOD, THE HURT LOCKER, even Lumet’s BEFORE THE DEVIL KNOWS YOUR DEAD) — and look at their box office, the fact that a movie like IDES (for all its flaws) gets made at all is something of an achievement.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.