‘Tabloid’ is a documentary disguised as satirical farce

- Advertisement -

Tabloid

Directed by Errol Morris

United States, 2010

Errol Morris makes documentaries about half-truths.  The Thin Blue Line, Fast, Cheap & Out of Control, Standard Operating Procedure all function on a level where truth is relative depending on the speaker.  Unlike other directors, Morris’ work is not always the search for truth – though sometimes it’s found regardless – as much as it is the search for the definition of truth, where honesty and fact are neither synonym nor antonym.

If The Thin Blue Line is a documentary disguised as a police procedural (or the other way around), Tabloid is a documentary disguised as satirical farce.  Former beauty queen Joyce McKinney is charged, in 1978, with kidnapping her boyfriend, Kirk Anderson after he disappeared and was, according to McKinney, brainwashed by the Mormons.  As pulpy as Sam Fuller, Tabloid accelerates through a lunatic tale of S&M, cloning, false wigs and moustaches, and sensationalism.  His voice featured in this film far more frequently than in his previous documentaries, even Errol Morris is hardly able to conceal his incredulity.

After deconstructing the reliability of video in Standard Operating Procedure, Morris continues his fascination with media and makes newsprint, particularly the art of the headline, the forefront of this most recent venture.  Interviewee’s words are repeated in grainy, newspaper-font, boiled down to only their shortest necessity.  This is the attention-grabbing quote, the one-liner, the dialogue ripped from context ala the gossip rags.  In his film Morris uses it to sometimes humorous, sometimes sardonic means.

A tongue-tied McKinney tries to remember the word ‘mini-bar’.  When she can’t, Morris flashes the word on-screen.  Mocking her?  Or treating her the same way the papers did? This is counter to other usages in the film, where the text appears just as the speaker says the words: a cinematic version of the picture and the quote.  Where in the papers one confirms the other’s validity, Morris’ usage seems so deprecating as to render both questionable.

When not using newspaper montages or headlines, Morris’ strategy seems to be to allow his subjects to empower or discredit themselves.  Consider an interview with former tabloid photographer Kent Gavin.  Presented as a mostly credible source throughout the film, Morris (and Gavin) pull the rug out from under our trust when, in response to the whereabouts of hard evidence, Gavin stutters his way around an answer, eventually indicating that the photographs in question are mostly gone.

It’s in this way, that Morris stays faithful to his half-truths.   There are not only two sides to each story and interview, there are also two interpretations of the characters involved. There are two Kirk Andersons: the “Manacled Mormon” as one newspaper titled him, and the misled boyfriend.  There are two McKinneys: the deceiver and the deceived.  There are even two Boogers, McKinney’s pet pit-bull: the original and the clone.  Tabloid, in all of its full-tilt, maniacal glory, rests somewhere between all of these.

– Neal Dhand

2 Comments
  1. truthteller says

    Our friend Joyce says “thanks” to you for being perceptive enough to pick up on the fact that the tabloid reporter was lying about having “100 nude photos of her”. There’s a lot more to Joyce’s story than the garbage in Morris’ twisted libelous film. If you would like to interview Joyce, call to arrange it with her manager at 718-406-1089.

  2. truthteller says

    Ms. McKinney, with an intelligence quotient in the genius range, has an excellent memory, I assure you. She did not use the word “Mini-bar”; ERROL MORRIS did. In fact there was not even a bar IN her hotel in Korea. (which was fine with her, as Joyce does not drink.) She merely stated that the cloned puppy (at four months old) reached up with its teeth and grabbed the cabinet door of the cabinet housing the small frig that most hotels have to keep drinks cold–Like Booger the clones had a knack for opening doors. THAT was her point. Which you–and Morris– both missed. (But then, Morris missed a LOT. He just doesn’t “get” Joyce’s story. He missed the boat by a mile. But he will “get it” when he is penned down in court just as he realizes just what hot water he is in for the malicious LIES he told in that filthy libelous film, which slanders Joyce, who can’t wait to get him in court! SEE YA THERE!

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.