Skip to Content

‘The Wandering Swordsman’ finds its way to a fulfilling experience

‘The Wandering Swordsman’ finds its way to a fulfilling experience
imageThe Wandering Swordsman
Written by Ni Kuang
Directed by Chang Cheh
Hong Kong, 1970

A hero need not be impervious to error. The most noble of heroes can in fact lack gravitas because they are too clean cut, too perfect. A character that can be led astray and commit errors in judgement will often make for much more compelling storytelling. The protagonist need not be written as someone with a ‘bad side.’ He or she can genuinely strive for upstanding citizenship, but by the nature of whom they are or the uncooperative circumstances beyond their control they experience failure on any number of levels. 1970s The Wandering  Swordsman, from workaholic director Chang Cheh, plays with the idea of the imperfect hero with impressive results.

The Wandering Swordsman is Chang film that once again stars David Chiang,  ostensibly playing the same character he so often did. He is a young, highly talented swordsman who runs, hops and pirouettes  his way around the country, encountering crooks and other sorts of gangsters who earn their living through illegal means. He intercepts them before they can ever flee with their bounty and, in true Robin Hood fashion, donates most of the money to people in need. Of course he does so with a infectious glee that oftentimes has him come across as a smart ass. Part Robin Hood, part Peter Pen the Wandering Swordsman is contempt with his lot in life. One day he makes the acquaintance of Jiang Ning (Lily Li), a pretty if temperamental sword fighter, whom he rescues from a thug in the woods. Jiang Ning is member of a group of highly trained soldiers tasked with transporting a valuables from one town to another, but word soon gets out, resulting in various criminals scheming plans to foil their mission. With so many players, both good and bad, wanting to either help the escort or defeat it, will the Wandering Swordsman differentiate who is on which side?

image
As alluded to in the introduction, the protagonist is a flawed being despite his often heroic demeanor. Early on he easily dispatches a couple of foes performing a robbery. He amuses himself greatly by mocking them (twice no less), prying their bounty with the greatest of ease. However, he gives every single silver tael to a group of refugees whose homes were destroyed through a flood, creating a later problem when he no long has any money to pay for the meal he eats at a restaurant, thus forcing him to sell is swords to complete the transaction. It is not the type of flaw one might expect when discussing imperfect heroes.  He has committed no great crime nor has he wronged anyone innocents, but he dove into his little excursion of vigilantism without thinking too clearly and it came back to bite embarrassingly in the end. After leaving the restaurant he even murmurs to himself that he got a ‘really bad deal out of this one.’ It is a simple error in judgement like that which can make a character much more complex than on face value. David Chiang does a superb job selling his Wandering Swordsman, making him brave, youthful and fun loving, but maybe a little short sighted. True to his usual form as an actor, he balances those aspects and personality traits perfectly.

imageThings grow even more complex when the lead villain, Fool Proof Kung (Cheung Pooi-saan), tricks the Wandering Swordsman into working for his side. Up until that point the Swordsman has caught, teased and defeated a series of inferior villains, later revealed to be Fool Proof’s brothers. Impressed by the Swordsman’s skills, he pleads the latter to join his group, claiming that they seek to intercept the escort and share the riches amongst the poor. This of course immediately strikes a chord with the Swordsman, who willingly comes to their aid. Once again, the Swordsman commits an error, only this one ends up having far graver consequences, some that may prove unforgivable. The movie puts a satisfying twist on the protagonist who at first seems infallible only to be played for the fool for much of the running length. The David Chiang charm definitely earns some mileage in making the hero a compelling figure, but it is his flaws that make him whole.  Even his meeting with Jiang Ning in the forest is the result of selfishness on the part of the Swordsman. Rather than make the protagonist intentionally unlikable, or difficult to cheer for, the film makes his flaws feel like a natural extension of who he is as a person.The supporting cast is fine too, with special mention going to Cheung Pooi-saan as the subtle yet hilarious Fool Proof Kung. Cheung is somewhat on the tubby side and has a sufficiently congenial attitude  mask some unspeakable villainy. He is not an actor who never overtakes every scene he is in, yet certainly makes his presence known and works well as a counterweight to the rambunctious David Chiang.The Wandering Swordsman is a really good movie, filled with some awkwardly funny moments, some stellar action and most of all a tremendously rich central character.

See also  Buffy Season 9's Finale Arc is Mostly Successful Thus Far, With Some Misses
-Edgar Chaput