‘Licence to Kill’ brings a modern edge to the character

- Advertisement -

Licence to Kill
Directed by John Glen
Screenplay by Michael G. Wilson and Richard Maibaum
UK, 1989

With the release of Skyfall this month, critics have cited the major departures from the Bond formula taken by that film. They credit Daniel Craig for bringing a modern edge to a character that had become ridiculous in the Brosnan years. It’s easy to forget that similar claims were made about Timothy Dalton back in the late ‘80s. The classically trained actor brought grace to the role with his first appearance in 1987’s The Living Daylights. That film retained the look and feeling of the Roger Moore films while starting the shift towards a more realistic hero. The change became a lot more dramatic in Dalton’s second outing two years later. Licence to Kill pared down the excesses of the typical Bond film and crafted a more personal tale of revenge. While the lead character still performs daring feats and outsmarts a ruthless villain, his motive isn’t to save the world. He may take down a drug dealer’s operations, but the true reasons have little to do with stopping illegal activities.

The story begins with the CIA getting the rare opportunity to capture Franz Sanchez (Robert Davi), a high-level drug dealer who rarely leaves his home country. Bond and his friend Felix Leiter (David Hedison) participate in the pursuit right before Leiter’s wedding. It’s a happy affair that seems to go perfectly, but it isn’t wise to cross a guy like Sanchez. His goons kill Leiter’s wife Della and feed him to the sharks, and Bond vows to take down the drug lord. The problem is that his superiors aren’t willing to stick their necks out to help him. After getting his license to kill revoked, Bond goes rogue and infiltrates Sanchez’s organization. Taking advantage of Sanchez’s obsession with loyalty, he raises discord within the group and sets up the final confrontation for all the marbles. Using his skills as a spy, Bond easily slips into the role as a hired killer to gain Sanchez’s trust and set him up for a fall.

One of the most surprising elements of Licence to Kill is its nasty violence, which includes vicious acts from Bond rarely seen in previous films from the series. Bond drops a guy in a drawer of maggots, shoots another with a spear, and sets up Sanchez to blow up a top henchman in a pressure chamber. The blood on screen is minimal, but the tone shifts far away from the comic moments from Moore’s tenure. Bond gets little enjoyment out of doing his job and kills with a surprising efficiency. While this approach moves closer to Ian Fleming’s original character, it also is quite a change for casual viewers. They looked at Bond as a light-hearted guy more interested in women and wit than delivering violence. This version still gets together with several ladies, but they’re secondary to his primary goals. His single-minded pursuit is taking down Sanchez, regardless of the consequences to others caught in the crossfire.

Unlike the action-heavy Craig films, this story takes its time and slowly builds the momentum towards its explosive finale. Even so, the two major action sequences rank among the series’ best. They come from a time when practical effects were still the norm, which makes the stunts even more impressive. Bond isn’t a superhero who can’t be injured, and his feats still fall within the realm of possibility. When he water skis behind a plane and steals the drug money, it’s a daring move but not impossible. The highlight is the climactic sequence involving tanker trucks while Bond and Sanchez duke it out. These vehicles were designed specifically to handle the remarkable moves and completely sell the action. The intense chase is more effective because the personal stakes are clear for Bond. He cares little for his own safety and refuses to let his prey escape. Dalton sells this tougher version of the character and doesn’t pander to audiences with jokes.

This is one of the best Bond films and underrated by many, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t some issues. The major one is Talisa Soto, who’s awkward as Lupe Lamora and can’t compete with Dalton or Davi. Her stilted line readings and thin character are painful. Carey Lowell does better as the other Bond girl Pam Bouvier. The downside is the way the screenplay betrays the character during the final act. She transforms from a hard-nosed pilot who stands up to Bond to a jealous girl more concerned with winning his heart. The writers tried to have it both ways and create a modern woman while still pushing her into a conventional role. The story is a major departure yet still retains some of the baggage from less forward-thinking past Bond films. It’s a step in the right direction but seems outdated when compared to women in the Craig movies.

Even with the flaws, License to Kill remains in the top tier of Bond movies. One of the main reasons is Robert Davi, who makes Sanchez a charismatic yet believable villain. He doesn’t have a problem getting his hands dirty and is a formidable adversary. Character actors like Anthony Zerbe, Everett McGill, and a very young Benicio Del Toro round out the cast nicely. There’s even a Wayne Newton appearance as a slimy evangelist who’s the perfect front for the criminal organization. Although it wasn’t a huge financial success in U.S., there are understandable reasons for the weaker box office. The summer of 1989 included massive hits like Batman, Lethal Weapon 2, and Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade to steal Bond’s thunder. Dalton was ready to return for a third movie, but legal troubles with the studio dragged too long for his liking. The spin for Goldeneye was a return to a “fun Bond”, but that unfairly diminishes Dalton’s accomplishments. He deserves tremendous credit for crafting a different character that set the stage for Craig to take him to the next level 17 years later.

Dan Heaton

Editor’s Note: This article was originally published November 15, 2015. 

This article is part of our 007 marathon. You can find all the entries by clicking here.

  1. Mack59 says

    This was the Bond film that both pleased the early Connery film fans and the Fleming books aficionados. Dalton is physically closest to Fleming’s description of Bond and the darkness of the literary character that we have seen till the series reboot. At the time of release people complained about the violence and nastiness of this film but as Dalton pointed out the early Bond films weren’t far a family audience they were for grown ups. That’s what we got here, a grown up Bond movie but while it pleased the series devotees for casual audience it was a step too ar outside of their comfort zone. I’m glad that the film and Dalton are finally getting the recognition they deserve and I’m sad that he never made more Bond films.

  2. E.K. says

    This is my favorite Bond film and I think it is one of the best but I think you are a bit too hard on Soto. Yes, Lowell outdoes her but her role was meatier than the trapped, desperate Lupe. She did well for a green actor and she looked really attractive as well, though so did Lowell.

    1. Dan Heaton says

      I agree that Lupe’s character isn’t as well-defined in the story, but she also doesn’t need to do that much. The fact that Soto can’t sell her attraction to Bond and offers flat line readings is the reason she falls short. You can look as recently as Skyfall to see a case where a female character has a thin back story but totally sells it.

  3. GJ says

    So nice to see someone else appreciating this film. I have long since sung its praises, particularly Dalton. After Craig and his films started getting all the credit for being tough and more violent, I always reminded people that Dalton did it first. I am really thrilled that others appreciate Licence to Kill and realize that it really is one of the best and underrated Bond films. Kudos for a great write-up; you raised so many points I have raised before with other people.

    1. Dan Heaton says

      Thanks GJ! I’ve been surprised to hear from so many people who appreciate Licence to Kill. The people who don’t like it and Dalton are so vocal that it’s easy to forget just how good it is. Craig’s films have gone a step further with the action and modern look, but it’s a lot easier now after Bourne, Nolan’s Batman films, etc.

  4. Tom says

    Good peice. I personally like the “fun Bond” myself, but for those that rave about the newer films, they should take a look at LTK.

    1. Dan Heaton says

      Thanks Tom. I also enjoy the fun Bond films, especially Roger Moore’s work like The Spy Who Loved Me and For Your Eyes Only. I think the new films are trying to strike that balance now, which is a good move.

  5. Victor De Leon says

    Great write up, Dan. I really love both Dalton entries. I would have liked to see him do at least one more. Thanks for the review and I agree with your observation about Dalton setting the stage for Craig.

    1. Dan Heaton says

      Thanks Victor! I think for Casino Royale, the producers decided to take the tougher approach of LTK but injected modern action and style. It’s paid off brilliantly for them so far.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.